FHA TO INCREASE MONTHLY AND UPFRONT MIP ON ALL LOANS

We have received news that FHA is increasing their monthly and up front mortgage insurance premium on all FHA loans starting April 9th! Any new files submitted on or after April 9th will be subject to this increase.

What does this mean to YOU and YOUR clients?

Based upon the increase your client will be paying more each month and in closing costs when they purchase a home using an FHA mortgage. We believe with this increase we may see more clients opt for a conventional mortgage as you can put as little as 5% down if their credit rating is 660 or above. The PMI will be cheaper on a conventional mortgage and there is no upfront mortgage insurance added to the closing costs.

These increases applied to a $150,000 loan:

OLD UFMIP: $1,500 (1% of loan)
NEW UFMIP: $2,625 (1.75% of loan)
* Financed into the loan amount on every FHA loan

OLD MONTHLY PMI: $143.75 (115 bps)
NEW MONTHLY PMI: $156.25 (125 bps)

If you and your client would like to avoid these changes as soon as possible, please submit your loan to us on or before April 7, 2012 to ensure you have current rates on upfront and monthly costs.

The Market in October

Homebuyers scooped up more previously owned homes in October, slowly putting a dent in the huge inventory on the market, an industry report showed. Sales of existing homes rose 1.4% last month to an annual rate of 4.97 million homes, up from a downwardly revised 4.90 million homes in September, the National Association of Realtors reported. That was higher than expected. Economists polled by Briefing.com had expected an annual rate of 4.85 million homes in October. Compared to a year ago, the rate of existing home sales has jumped 13.5%, from 4.38 million units. Continued gains in home sales have lightened up the inventory of homes on the market, the report showed. Total housing inventory at the end of October slipped 2.2% to 3.33 million existing homes for sales, representing an 8-month supply at the current sales pace. That’s down from an 8.3-month supply in September, and continues an ongoing downward trend since hitting a record high of 4.58 million in July 2008. Source: CNN/Money

Michigan Homes Sales: Steady on Units and Average Sales Price

For the fourth straight month, Michigan’s monthly home sales outpaced last year while average prices remained steady. According to the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) reports compiled by the Michigan Association of REALTORS®, 8.717 single-family homes sales increased 3.26% in October compared to October 2010. At the same time, the average sales price for Michigan homes was $109,708 in October; the YTD price has been over $105,000 for five months straight. Sales in the last four months are nearly 9% above last year.

Several locals showed an increase in sales volume while Eastern Thumb, Emmet, Grand Rapids and West Central all showed an increase in number of sales of 15% or more.

Key Statistics:
$107,941 – 2011 average sales price, YTD
88,774 – 2011 single family units sold, YTD
$ 9,582,354,334- 2011 total sales volume, YTD

Monthly housing statistics for MAR are reported by participating Michigan REALTOR® local boards and associations.

View the October Housing Statistics in Michigan

Rental Vacancies, Homeownership Rates Rise

via Mortgage News Daily

The Homeowner Vacancy Rate declined slightly in the third quarter while vacancies rose in rental housing according to information reported today by the U.S. Census Bureau.  Rental vacancies are currently at 9.8 percent, up from 9.2 percent in the second quarter but 0.5 percent lower than one year earlier.  Rental vacancies peaked in the third quarter of 2009 at 11.1 percent.

What are termed homeowner vacancies, i.e. the proportion of the homeowner inventory that is vacant for sale, fell to 2.4 percent from 2.5 percent in both the second quarter and Q3 of 2010.  This vacancy number has remained relatively stable throughout the housing crises.

There were 132.4 million housing units counted in the third quarter, an increase of 519,000 since Q3 2010.  Of that number, 113.5 million were occupied, an increase of 644,000 units.  75.2 million of those units were owner occupied (-244,000) and 38299 were rental units (904,000).   A total of 14.2 percent of the housing stock is vacant.  10.9 percent of all properties are vacant year-round properties, 3.2 percent are for rent, 1.4 percent are for sale, and 5.4 percent are being held off of the market.

Rental vacancies are slightly higher in principal cities (10.4 percent) than in the suburbs (9.1 percent) and were lower in the third quarter of 2011 than in the corresponding quarter of 2010 (10.5 percent.)  The change in the suburbs was more dramatic with vacancies dropping to 9.1 percent from 10.1 percent year over year.  Vacancies inside of MSAs decreased from 10.3 percent to 9.8.  Homeowner vacancies ranged from 2.3 percent outside of MSAs to 2.6 percent in principal cities and all rates were slightly lower than the corresponding numbers in Q3 2010.

There was a wide variation among both rental and homeowner vacancies rates on a regional basis, and more definitive rates of change.  In the Northeast the rental rate was 8.0 percent, up from 7.4 percent year-over-year and the homeowner rate was 2.2 (compared to 1.6 percent.)  The Midwest rental rate was 10.5 percent (down from 11.5 percent) and 2.4 percent for homeowner properties (down from 2.6 percent.)  The rental and homeowner rates were 12.2 percent and 2.5 percent in the South compared to 12.9 percent and 2.8 percent in 2010, and in the West the rates were 7.3 percent and 2.3 percent compared to 8.1 percent and 2.6 percent.

The median asking price for vacant rental housing units in the U.S. is $700, up slightly from Q2.  Median rents peaked in mid-2009 at around $725.  The median asking price for a vacant home for sale is approximately $140,000 down slightly from Q2 but well below the pre-crisis peak of $200,000 in early 2007.

The current homeownership rate is 66.3 percent compared to 65.9 percent in Q2 and 66.9 percent one year earlier.  The rate is highest in the Midwest (70.3 percent) and lowest in the West (60.7 percent).  Demographically, the rate rises steadily through each age group, from 38.0 percent among those under 35 years to a peak of 81.1 percent among persons 65 years of age and older.  Non-Hispanic Whites have a rate of 73.8 percent Blacks 45.6 percent, Hispanics 47.6 percent and all other races 56.4 percent.   Not surprisingly, households with a family income equal to or greater than the median have a homeownership rate of 81.3 percent compared to a rate of 51.3 percent among household with less than a median family income.

Read full article here.

U.S. Grows at 2.5% Pace in Q3: Is the Recovery Back On Track?

via The Atlantic
Finally, the U.S. gets a solid dose of good economic news: GDP grew at an annualized rate of 2.5% in the third quarter. After growing at a rate of just 0.8% in the first half of the year, that’s pretty welcome news. The quarter’s growth rate was the highest in a year. This appears to show that the recovery is back on track. Unfortunately, that track was a jobless recovery.

Today’s report probably comes as a relief to many: a double dip no longer appears to be imminent. But that doesn’t mean the U.S. recovery is suddenly strong and enduring. At this point, it’s neither.

While 2.5% growth is better than a weaker result, it isn’t enough to count on a much brisker rate of hiring. After the U.S. grew at the same pace in the third quarter of 2010, jobs were added at the pace of just 139,000 per month in the fourth quarter. That isn’t enough to make a significant dent in the unemployment rate. As a means of comparison, when unemployment dropped from 9.2% to 8.3% in the fourth quarter of 1983, GDP growth was 8.1% in the third quarter.

Other obstacles also remain firmly in place for the U.S. economy. Consumer confidence continues to struggle. In the third quarter, Americans’ spending was responsible for most of the growth we saw. If it suddenly slows due to gloomy consumers, then GDP growth will fade as well. Although we’re seeing some progress in Europe, its problems are not yet entirely solved. Of course, it’s also important to remember that this is just the first estimate of third quarter growth. We’ll get two more revisions over the next two months.

We should be cautiously optimistic about today’s growth estimate. The proper response is an it-could-have-been-worse attitude about the quarter’s measure of economic activity. While it appears to show that the U.S. isn’t headed into another recession, it doesn’t indicate that the nation’s troubles are entirely behind it.

Read the full article here.

HARP 2.0 Not a Game Changer

The hype from Monday’s HARP 2.0 announcement about making it easier for credit-impaired borrowers to refinance might give the impression that it will filter through into the economy and the housing market. It is a good step, but in a conference call from Credit Suisse, analysts pointed out “this is not a game changer” to housing or the economy. They estimate 720k borrowers will be able to refinance which translates to between $2 and $3 billion in interest savings; so not much impact to the economy or housing. But many investors are focused on HARP 2.0′s reps and warrants information. The biggest surprise may have been that Fannie and Freddie will waive their rights to demand refunds from lenders after flawed loan underwriting in many cases. FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco told reporters the companies would offer “substantial” relief from buyback demands when HARP is used without providing “blanket or absolute” waivers, except for fraud. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also will remove ceilings on the permitted difference between loan amounts and property values and reduce or eliminate certain upfront fees charged for weaker credits, the FHFA said. The mortgage-finance companies will also nix appraisals in more instances and require on-time payments only over the prior six months, rather than as long as one year. Look for specifics by 11/15.
Source: Mortgage News Daily

Rural Development Loans Reminder!

Effective for USDA Commitments issued on/after 10/01/11: All purchase and refinance loans will be subject to an annual fee (MIP) of 0.30% of the outstanding principal balance. This will be included in the borrower’s monthly PITI and remitted to the agency by the Servicer on the anniversary of the Note Date. The originator is responsible for the initial calculation but for subsequent years, the Servicer is responsible. The upfront fee will be reduced on Purchase Transactions from the current 3.50% down to 2.0%; Refinance fees remain at 1.0%. Calculate the annual fee for the first year of the loan using the full loan amount times the 0.30% annual fee, divided by 12 months which must then be included in the qualifying PITI. Qualifying Ratios are based on the inclusion of the monthly installment of the annual MIP fee. It is important to note that this annual fee is for the full life of the loan, it will never drop off regardless of outstanding principal balance or payment history. The fee structure will be subject to all loans with USDA 1980-18 commitments issued on or after 10/01/2011. Any loan that does not have a USDA 1980-18 commitment issued on or before 09/30/2011 must be restructured under the new fee structure as required by the agency (USDA). This will require a full re-disclosure to the borrower, re-underwrite with the reduced upfront fee, inclusion of the annual MIP in the PITI and is subject to all RESPA requirements. Should a USDA committed and obligated loan require a loan amount increase on or after the fee structure changes take place, the new fee structure will be required. USDA will not grandfather in the previous fee structure to any changes required on a previously committed loan.

Here are some FAQ‘s…..
Obligation Date: If a loan request is submitted to RD on or before September 30, 2011, but cannot be obligated until October 1, 2011 or later, will the loan be subject to an annual fee?

Response: Yes. All loan requests with an obligation date of October 1, 2011 or later will be subject to an annual fee….NO EXCEPTIONS.
__________________________
Conditional Commitment Expiration: Will a loan be subject to the annual fee if the Conditional Commitment expiration date is on or after October 1, 2011?

Response: If the Conditional Commitment is dated prior to October 1, 2011, the loan will not be subject to an annual fee as the loan should already be obligated with FY 2011 funds that are not subject to an annual fee.
____________________________________________________
Fee Disclosure: How will the annual fee be disclosed?
Response: RD will disclose the annual fee to the applicant by amending Form RD 1980-21, “Request for Single Family Housing Guarantee.” The annual fee will be disclosed to the lenders by amending Form RD 1980-18, “Conditional Commitment for Single Family Housing Guarantee” and Form RD 1980-17, “Loan Note Guarantee.” The forms will be revised with an effective date of October 1, 2011.
______________________________
Calculating the Annual Fee: How will the annual fee be calculated?

Response: Based on the total loan amount (including any up-front guarantee fee financed in the loan), the initial fee for the first year of the loan will be determined and calculated based on the scheduled average Unpaid Principal Balance (UPB) for the first year. Remaining years of the loan will also be calculated and charged on the scheduled average UPB , not the actual UPB. An Upfront and Annual Fee Calculator is available for public use to assist in calculating the upfront and annual fee. The Guaranteed Underwriting System and the internal Guaranteed Loan System will also calculate and display an annual fee loan amortization schedule once the new software is implemented in late September
___________________________________________________________
Fee Calculator: To ensure the fee is accurately calculated, is there an RD Annual Fee Calculator to assist with calculation of the fee?

Response: Yes. The annual fee calculator is now online, and located at: https://usdalinc.sc.egov.usda.gov/USDALincTrainingResourceLib.do

 

#MortgageTalk

Read what we’re talking about this week from legal woes with short sales to sanctions against lenders.

1. Survey Finds REOs and Short Sales Are Major Causes of Legal Disputes http://t.co/vGgmbXe

2. The Mortgage Interest Deduction is About to Get Whackedhttp://t.co/MnFwd74

3. FHA Announces Sanctions Against 240 Lenders http://bit.ly/o5IcKZ

4. Metro Foreclosure Rates Decline Due to Processing Delays: RealtyTrac http://t.co/Ktz1SIl

Join the discussion on Twitter via #MortgageTalk and follow us@JohnAdamsMoCo.

MSHDA Tax Reimbursement Program

*Homeowners that are enrolled in the MSHDA’s Recapture Tax Reimbursement Program will be reimbursed for the amount of the recapture tax paid.

A request may be made by providing MSHDA with an IRS form 8828, evidence of payment, and a signed copy of their IRS 1040 form.

Speak with your John Adams Mortgage Professional to verify your qualification for the MSHDA’s Recapture Tax Reimbursement Program.

 

* The amount will be minimal and never exceed one-half of the gain on the sale of the home, or 6.25 percent of the original mortgage, whichever is less.


 

Mortgage Assistance Relief Services

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a new regulation known as the “Mortgage Assistance Relief Services” Rule (the “Rule”). Mortgage relief scams are getting homeowners left and right, claiming that for a fee, negotiations will occur with their mortgage lender or service to obtain a loan modification, a short sale or other relief from foreclosure.

To prevent false claims, the Rule is a series of regulations to protect you, the consumer, from these scams.

Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (“MARS”) providers are defined to include providers of any of the following services, if service is provided in exchange for consideration:

  • Stopping, preventing or postponing foreclosure;
  • Negotiating a loan modification, foreclosure or extension; and or
  • negating a short sale or deed in lieu arrangement

Also, the Rule covers sale-leaseback transactions marketed as a way to save a consumer’s home from foreclosure. MARS providers are required to make certain disclosures and are prohibited from collecting any fees in advance. The Rule prohibits MARS providers from making misleading claims about services they provide. They are also prohibited from advising consumers to not communicate with their own lender.

Below are a few disclosures to the Rule that mortgage relief companies within their advertising and communications at individual consumers must disclose:

  • they are not associated with the government, and their services have not been approved by the government or the consumer’s lender;
  • the lender may not agree to change the consumer’s loan; and
  • if companies tell consumers to stop paying their mortgage, they must also tell them they could lose their home and damage their credit rating.

It must also be explained to the consumer that they can stop doing business with the company at any tim, can accept or reject any offer the company obtains from the lender or servicer, and, if they reject the offer, they don’t have to pay the company’s fee (companies must disclose the amount of the fee).

For more information on the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule, download a copy of the manuscript here.

Remember to call your John Adams Mortgage Professional to discuss mortgage programs and payments.